[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16670976#comment-16670976
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-13752:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  8s{color} 
| {color:red} HDFS-13752 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-13752 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/25405/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> fs.Path stores file path in java.net.URI causes big memory waste
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-13752
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13752
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fs
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.6
>         Environment: Hive 2.1.1 and hadoop 2.7.6 
>            Reporter: Barnabas Maidics
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-13752.001.patch, HDFS-13752.002.patch, 
> HDFS-13752.003.patch, HDFSbenchmark.pdf, Screen Shot 2018-07-20 at 
> 11.12.38.png, heapdump-100000partitions.html, measurement.pdf
>
>
> I was looking at HiveServer2 memory usage, and a big percentage of this was 
> because of org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path, where you store file paths in a 
> java.net.URI object. The URI implementation stores the same string in 3 
> different objects (see the attached image). In Hive when there are many 
> partitions this cause a big memory usage. In my particular case 42% of memory 
> was used by java.net.URI so it could be reduced to 14%. 
> I wonder if the community is open to replace it with a more memory efficient 
> implementation and what other things should be considered here? It can be a 
> huge memory improvement for Hadoop and for Hive as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to