[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Wei-Chiu Chuang updated HDFS-12946:
-----------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 3.3.0
           Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

Thanks [~xiaochen] for the review and [~knanasi] for the patch.
The last patch had a white space warning which I fixed during the commit. 
Attached patch rev12 for posterity.

> Add a tool to check rack configuration against EC policies
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-12946
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12946
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: erasure-coding
>            Reporter: Xiao Chen
>            Assignee: Kitti Nanasi
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.3.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-12946.01.patch, HDFS-12946.02.patch, 
> HDFS-12946.03.patch, HDFS-12946.04.fsck.patch, HDFS-12946.05.patch, 
> HDFS-12946.06.patch, HDFS-12946.07.patch, HDFS-12946.08.patch, 
> HDFS-12946.09.patch, HDFS-12946.10.patch, HDFS-12946.11.patch, 
> HDFS-12946.12.patch
>
>
> From testing we have seen setups with problematic racks / datanodes that 
> would not suffice basic EC usages. These are usually found out only after the 
> tests failed.
> We should provide a way to check this beforehand.
> Some scenarios:
> - not enough datanodes compared to EC policy's highest data+parity number
> - not enough racks to satisfy BPPRackFaultTolerant
> - highly uneven racks to satisfy BPPRackFaultTolerant
> - highly uneven racks (so that BPP's considerLoad logic may exclude some busy 
> nodes on the rack, resulting in #2)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to