[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16724542#comment-16724542
]
Anu Engineer commented on HDDS-929:
-----------------------------------
When I apply this patch and run tests locally I get a large number of failures.
{code}
com.google.protobuf.UninitializedMessageException: Message missing required
fields: maxKeyLen
at
com.google.protobuf.AbstractMessage$Builder.newUninitializedMessageException(AbstractMessage.java:770)
at
org.apache.hadoop.ozone.protocol.proto.OzoneManagerProtocolProtos$SecretKeyProto$Builder.build(OzoneManagerProtocolProtos.java:30185)
at
org.apache.hadoop.ozone.security.OzoneSecretKey.write(OzoneSecretKey.java:110)
{code}
Can you please take a quick look?
There is also a set of ErrorProne errors in the HDDS-4 branch from earlier code
patches that got committed, I will post a patch here that you can incorporate
to your changes if needed.
> Remove ozone.max.key.len property
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-929
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-929
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Ajay Kumar
> Assignee: Ajay Kumar
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDDS-929-HDDS-4.00.patch
>
>
> Generation of secret key in OzoneSecretManager is different from hadoop
> SecretManager. Since key-pair generation is not the responsibility of
> {{OzoneSecretManager}}/{{OzoneSecretKey}} we don't need maxKeyLen related
> checks inside them. Jira proposes to remove ozone.max.key.len.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
