[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16725556#comment-16725556
 ] 

Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-14162:
--------------------------------------------

Attached a test, which captures this. It is similar to HDFS-14116, but Balancer 
is a priority.
I see Balancer uses both Client and Namenode Protocols. So may be we should 
create a combined proxy serving on both protocols. Why should there be 
different proxies.
This beside the fact that the ProxyFactory is a wrong one.

> Balancer should work with ObserverNode
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14162
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14162
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: testBalancerWithObserver.patch
>
>
> Balancer provides a substantial RPC load on NameNode. It would be good to 
> divert Balancer RPCs {{getBlocks()}}, etc. to ObserverNode. The main problem 
> is that Balancer uses {{NamenodeProtocol}}, while ORPP currently supports 
> only {{ClientProtocol}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to