[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16757771#comment-16757771
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-13209:
----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
38s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 13 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
24s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 23m
48s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 3m
52s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
27s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
38s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
17m 4s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 4m
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
54s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 3m
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 3m
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 3m
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
1m 14s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project: The patch generated 8 new +
1030 unchanged - 1 fixed = 1038 total (was 1031) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 48s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 5m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
10s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}110m 12s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 17m 9s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}215m 13s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestProcessCorruptBlocks |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancer |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.web.TestRouterWebHDFSContractSeek |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractRename |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractConcat |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractSeek |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractRootDirectory |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.web.TestRouterWebHDFSContractOpen |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterQuota |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.web.TestRouterWebHDFSContractConcat |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractAppend |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractMkdir |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterAllResolver |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.web.TestRouterWebHDFSContractCreate |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.web.TestRouterWebHDFSContractAppend |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterRpc |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractCreate |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.web.TestRouterWebHDFSContractRootDirectory |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractDelete |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterRpcMultiDestination |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.web.TestRouterWebHDFSContractRename |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractGetFileStatus |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.TestRouterHDFSContractOpen |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.web.TestRouterWebHDFSContractDelete |
| | hadoop.fs.contract.router.web.TestRouterWebHDFSContractMkdir |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:8f97d6f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-13209 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12957148/HDFS-13209-02.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle cc |
| uname | Linux d86ffc108a98 3.13.0-153-generic #203-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 14
08:52:28 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / bcc3a79 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26105/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26105/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26105/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26105/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 2959 (vs. ulimit of 10000) |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf U:
hadoop-hdfs-project |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26105/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> DistributedFileSystem.create should allow an option to provide StoragePolicy
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-13209
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13209
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: hdfs
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
> Assignee: Ayush Saxena
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-13209-01.patch, HDFS-13209-02.patch
>
>
> DistributedFileSystem.create allows to get a FSDataOutputStream. The stored
> file and related blocks will used the directory based StoragePolicy.
>
> However, sometime, we might need to keep all files in the same directory
> (consistency constraint) but might want some of them on SSD (small, in my
> case) until they are processed and merger/removed. Then they will go on the
> default policy.
>
> When creating a file, it will be useful to have an option to specify a
> different StoragePolicy...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
