[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16771323#comment-16771323
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14292:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  7s{color} 
| {color:red} HDFS-14292 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14292 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12959159/HDFS-14292.2.patch |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26250/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Introduce Java ExecutorService to DataXceiverServer
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14292
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14292
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: BELUGA BEHR
>            Assignee: BELUGA BEHR
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-14292.1.patch, HDFS-14292.2.patch
>
>
> I wanted to investigate {{dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads}} from 
> {{hdfs-site.xml}}.  It is described as "Specifies the maximum number of 
> threads to use for transferring data in and out of the DN."   The default 
> value is 4096.  I found it interesting because 4096 threads sounds like a lot 
> to me.  I'm not sure how a system with 8-16 cores would react to this large a 
> thread count.  Intuitively, I would say that the overhead of context 
> switching would be immense.
> During mt investigation, I discovered the 
> [following|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/DataXceiverServer.java#L203-L216]
>  setup in the {{DataXceiverServer}} class:
> # A peer connects to a DataNode
> # A new thread is spun up to service this connection
> # The thread runs to completion
> # The tread dies
> It would perhaps be better if we used a thread pool to better manage the 
> lifecycle of the service threads and to allow the DataNode to re-use existing 
> threads, saving on the need to create and spin-up threads on demand.
> In this JIRA, I have added a couple of things:
> # Added a thread pool that will always maintain a single thread running, 
> always awaiting a new connection should one arrive.  On-demand, it will 
> create up to {{dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads}}.  A thread that has 
> completed its prior duties will stay idle for up to 30 seconds, it will be 
> retired if no new work has arrived.
> # Added new methods to the {{Peer}} Interface to allow for better logging and 
> less code within each Thread ({{DataXceiver}}).
> # Updated the Thread code ({{DataXceiver}}) regarding its interactions with 
> {{blockReceiver}} instance variable



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to