[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16771471#comment-16771471
 ] 

BELUGA BEHR commented on HDFS-14296:
------------------------------------

This is a good reference.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/322715/when-to-use-linkedlist-over-arraylist-in-java

> Prefer ArrayList over LinkedList in VolumeScanner
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14296
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14296
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: BELUGA BEHR
>            Assignee: BELUGA BEHR
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HDFS-14296.1.patch
>
>
> {quote}The {{size}}, {{isEmpty}}, {{get}}, {{set}}, {{iterator}}, and 
> {{listIterator}} operations run in constant time. - ArrayList
> {quote}
> However, for a {{LinkedList}}, the entire list must be traversed to get to 
> the desired index.
> Like 
> [Here|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/VolumeScanner.java#L384]
> Most of the time, the List is being iterated, which is quicker over a 
> primitive array than walking a LinkedList.
> There is one place where an item is removed, potentially from the middle of 
> the list 
> [here|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/VolumeScanner.java#L736]
>  but the speed of removing from the middle of the list isn't bad; it's a 
> system native array shift, and it only happens on the off chance that a block 
> pool is removed from the DataNode.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to