[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16778059#comment-16778059
 ] 

BELUGA BEHR commented on HDFS-14295:
------------------------------------

[~elgoiri] Latest patch has logging.

The new behavior is that it waits for at most 30 seconds on shutdown to allow 
existing work to finish gracefully.  I'm not sure we want to enforce the 
behavior with a test.  The current behavior is to let the JVM kill the daemon 
thread on the way out, so it is very low risk that this behavior will be worse 
than that.

> Add Threadpool for DataTransfers
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14295
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14295
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: BELUGA BEHR
>            Assignee: BELUGA BEHR
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-14295.1.patch, HDFS-14295.2.patch, 
> HDFS-14295.3.patch, HDFS-14295.4.patch, HDFS-14295.5.patch, HDFS-14295.6.patch
>
>
> When a DataNode data transfers a block, is spins up a new thread for each 
> transfer.  
> [Here|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/DataNode.java#L2339]
>  and 
> [Here|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/DataNode.java#L3019-L3022].
>    Instead, add the threads to a {{CachedThreadPool}} so that when their 
> threads complete the transfer, they can be re-used for another transfer. This 
> should save resources spent on creating and spinning up transfer threads.
> One thing I'll point out that's a bit off, which I address in this patch, ...
> There are two places in the code where a {{DataTransfer}} thread is started. 
> In [one 
> place|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/DataNode.java#L2339-L2341],
>  it's started in a default thread group. In [another 
> place|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/DataNode.java#L3019-L3022],
>  it's started in the 
> [dataXceiverServer|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/DataNode.java#L1164]
>  thread group.
> I do not think it's correct to include any of these threads in the 
> {{dataXceiverServer}} thread group. Anything submitted to the 
> {{dataXceiverServer}} should probably be tied to the 
> {{dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads}} configurations, and neither of these 
> methods are. Instead, they should be submitted into the same thread pool with 
> its own thread group (probably the default thread group, unless someone 
> suggests otherwise) and is what I have included in this patch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to