[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16807341#comment-16807341
]
star commented on HDFS-14370:
-----------------------------
[~xkrogen]， agree. Server side handler as limited resource should not be
blocked.
{quote}This is similar to how the NN, when it wants a client to backoff due to
load, throws a backoff exception and expects the client to act accordingly.
{quote}
> Edit log tailing fast-path should allow for backoff
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-14370
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14370
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode, qjm
> Affects Versions: 3.3.0
> Reporter: Erik Krogen
> Assignee: Erik Krogen
> Priority: Major
>
> As part of HDFS-13150, in-progress edit log tailing was changed to use an
> RPC-based mechanism, thus allowing the edit log tailing frequency to be
> turned way down, and allowing standby/observer NameNodes to be only a few
> milliseconds stale as compared to the Active NameNode.
> When there is a high volume of transactions on the system, each RPC fetches
> transactions and takes some time to process them, self-rate-limiting how
> frequently an RPC is submitted. In a lightly loaded cluster, however, most of
> these RPCs return an empty set of transactions, consuming a high
> (de)serialization overhead for very little benefit. This was reported by
> [~jojochuang] in HDFS-14276 and I have also seen it on a test cluster where
> the SbNN was submitting 8000 RPCs per second that returned empty.
> I propose we add some sort of backoff to the tailing, so that if an empty
> response is received, it will wait a longer period of time before submitting
> a new RPC.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
