[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Eric Yang updated HDDS-1495:
----------------------------
    Attachment: HDDS-1495.005.patch

> Create hadoop/ozone docker images with inline build process
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-1495
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1495
>             Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Elek, Marton
>            Assignee: Eric Yang
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HADOOP-16091.001.patch, HADOOP-16091.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1495.003.patch, HDDS-1495.004.patch, HDDS-1495.005.patch
>
>
> This is proposed by [~eyang] in 
> [this|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/33ac54bdeacb4beb023ebd452464603aaffa095bd104cb43c22f484e@%3Chdfs-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E]
>  mailing thread.
> {quote}1, 3. There are 38 Apache projects hosting docker images on Docker hub 
> using Apache Organization. By browsing Apache github mirror. There are only 7 
> projects using a separate repository for docker image build. Popular projects 
> official images are not from Apache organization, such as zookeeper, tomcat, 
> httpd. We may not disrupt what other Apache projects are doing, but it looks 
> like inline build process is widely employed by majority of projects such as 
> Nifi, Brooklyn, thrift, karaf, syncope and others. The situation seems a bit 
> chaotic for Apache as a whole. However, Hadoop community can decide what is 
> best for Hadoop. My preference is to remove ozone from source tree naming, if 
> Ozone is intended to be subproject of Hadoop for long period of time. This 
> enables Hadoop community to host docker images for various subproject without 
> having to check out several source tree to trigger a grand build. However, 
> inline build process seems more popular than separated process. Hence, I 
> highly recommend making docker build inline if possible.
> {quote}
> The main challenges are also discussed in the thread:
> {code:java}
> 3. Technically it would be possible to add the Dockerfile to the source
> tree and publish the docker image together with the release by the
> release manager but it's also problematic:
> {code}
> a) there is no easy way to stage the images for the vote
>  c) it couldn't be flagged as automated on dockerhub
>  d) It couldn't support the critical updates.
>  * Updating existing images (for example in case of an ssl bug, rebuild
>  all the existing images with exactly the same payload but updated base
>  image/os environment)
>  * Creating image for older releases (We would like to provide images,
>  for hadoop 2.6/2.7/2.7/2.8/2.9. Especially for doing automatic testing
>  with different versions).
> {code:java}
>  {code}
> The a) can be solved (as [~eyang] suggested) with using a personal docker 
> image during the vote and publish it to the dockerhub after the vote (in case 
> the permission can be set by the INFRA)
> Note: based on LEGAL-270 and linked discussion both approaches (inline build 
> process / external build process) are compatible with the apache release.
> Note: HDDS-851 and HADOOP-14898 contains more information about these 
> problems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to