[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16845414#comment-16845414
]
star commented on HDFS-12914:
-----------------------------
Thanks [~smarella]. A few questioins for reference only.
1. Guess it's a mistake updating version of protobuf.
{code:java}
<protobuf.version>2.5.0.t02</protobuf.version>
{code}
2. Do we need a test case?
3. Should we do more logs about full block lease so that we can inspect issues
easier? [~smarella], [~hexiaoqiao],[~jojochuang].
> Block report leases cause missing blocks until next report
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-12914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12914
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 2.8.0, 2.9.2
> Reporter: Daryn Sharp
> Assignee: Santosh Marella
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: HDFS-12914-branch-2.001.patch, HDFS-12914-trunk.00.patch
>
>
> {{BlockReportLeaseManager#checkLease}} will reject FBRs from DNs for
> conditions such as "unknown datanode", "not in pending set", "lease has
> expired", wrong lease id, etc. Lease rejection does not throw an exception.
> It returns false which bubbles up to {{NameNodeRpcServer#blockReport}} and
> interpreted as {{noStaleStorages}}.
> A re-registering node whose FBR is rejected from an invalid lease becomes
> active with _no blocks_. A replication storm ensues possibly causing DNs to
> temporarily go dead (HDFS-12645), leading to more FBR lease rejections on
> re-registration. The cluster will have many "missing blocks" until the DNs
> next FBR is sent and/or forced.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
