[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13131020#comment-13131020
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-2430:
-----------------------------------

I think option #1 is better - agree #2 is more flexible but I can't think of 
any real use cases.

The other thing that needs to be considered in this design, though, is that we 
need to think separately about edits storage vs name directories. Edits may be 
stored in other implementations in the not-so-distant future (eg bookkeeper). 
So it's not just the name dirs, but also the edits managers which need to have 
such a configuration.
                
> The number of failed or low-resource volumes the NN can tolerate should be 
> configurable
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-2430
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2430
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: name-node
>    Affects Versions: 0.24.0
>            Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
>            Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
>
> Currently the number of failed or low-resource volumes the NN can tolerate is 
> effectively hard-coded at 1. It would be nice if this were configurable.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to