[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16869592#comment-16869592
 ] 

Eric Yang commented on HDDS-1711:
---------------------------------

{quote}This patch should be rebased (pull requests can be reviewed without 
rebasing as they have dedicated branches. I recommend to use PRs instead of 
patch uploads){quote}

This patch depends on HDDS-1667 changes.  This is the reason that I haven't 
change status to patch available, there is no need to rebase patch.  I find it 
distracting to switch between pull request comments and JIRA comments, hence I 
will continue to use JIRA for my main working model.

{quote}pom.xml modifications are missing from this patch 
(hadoop-ozone/dist){quote}

That is part of HDDS-1667 patch 006, but it looks like HDDS-1667.006 needs to 
be rebased because you committed HDDS-1678.

> Set a global reference property for Ozone image name
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-1711
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1711
>             Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Eric Yang
>            Assignee: Eric Yang
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDDS-1711.001.patch
>
>
> Ozone Kubernetes templates are using docker.image property for controlling 
> which image to run Kubernetes examples.  It would be best to rename the 
> property to ozone.docker.image to prevent conflict between Ozone and other 
> Hadoop sub-projects.
> There are also a few typo in the existing Kubernetes templates that reference 
> to elek/ozone.  This looks like need to match the default Ozone image.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to