[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13135205#comment-13135205
 ] 

Suresh Srinivas commented on HDFS-2354:
---------------------------------------

bq. The implementation in HDFS-1974 has the drawback that Namenode / 
NamenodeRpcServer implements HAServiceProtocol, which is against the goal of 
HDFS-1623 to build a framework for HA.

Can you explain hot it is against the goal of HDFS-1623? I think you may be 
misunderstanding HAServiceProtocol's intent. HAServiceProtocol allows Namenode 
to be treated as a resource. Whether it is CRM+LRM from Linux HA or 
FailoverController, both need this. This is irrespective of where 
FailoverController sits - as a separate daemon or a module inside the namenode 
process.

I have been very confused by neutral state and how it avoids the need for 
fencing. If you create a detailed write up on this aspect, I am willing to 
spend some time on that.
                
> Generalize the HAServiceProtocol interface
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-2354
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2354
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: name-node
>            Reporter: Justin Joseph
>            Assignee: Justin Joseph
>         Attachments: HAService_fw_Class_Diagram.JPG, HDFS-2354.1.patch, 
> HDFS-2354.patch
>
>
> This JIRA intends to revisit the patches committed for HADOOP-7455 and 
> HDFS-1974 & to provide more generic interfaces which allows alternative HA 
> implementations to co-exist complying with HAServiceProtocol.
> Some of the considerations are
> 1) Support life cycle methods (start*() and stop() APIs) in HAServiceProtocol
> 2) Support custom states in HAServiceProtocol
> 3) As per the patch submitted for HDFS-1974, Namenode implements HAService 
> interface. This needs to be reconsidered.
> I will elaborate on these points, in the form of comments below.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to