[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16891177#comment-16891177
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14637:
----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
57s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 1m
50s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 21m
39s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 22m
3s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 2m
33s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
1s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 45s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
38s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
26s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
25s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 21m
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 21m
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 2m
22s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 265 unchanged - 1
fixed = 265 total (was 266) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 21s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}124m 48s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 8m
6s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-dynamometer-infra in the patch passed. {color}
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}249m 50s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlocksWithNotEnoughRacks |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDirectoryScanner |
| | hadoop.hdfs.web.TestWebHdfsTimeouts |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSInotifyEventInputStreamKerberized |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.0 Server=19.03.0 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14637 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12975492/HDFS-14637.004.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 7a210cd85923 4.4.0-138-generic #164-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 2
17:16:02 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / eb36b09 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_212 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27280/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27280/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 3698 (vs. ulimit of 10000) |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
hadoop-tools/hadoop-dynamometer/hadoop-dynamometer-infra U: . |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27280/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Namenode may not replicate blocks to meet the policy after enabling
> upgradeDomain
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-14637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14637
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 3.3.0
> Reporter: Stephen O'Donnell
> Assignee: Stephen O'Donnell
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14637.001.patch, HDFS-14637.002.patch,
> HDFS-14637.003.patch, HDFS-14637.004.patch
>
>
> After changing the network topology or placement policy on a cluster and
> restarting the namenode, the namenode will scan all blocks on the cluster at
> startup, and check if they meet the current placement policy. If they do not,
> they are added to the replication queue and the namenode will arrange for
> them to be replicated to ensure the placement policy is used.
> If you start with a cluster with no UpgradeDomain, and then enable
> UpgradeDomain, then on restart the NN does notice all the blocks violate the
> placement policy and it adds them to the replication queue. I believe there
> are some issues in the logic that prevents the blocks from replicating
> depending on the setup:
> With UD enabled, but no racks configured, and possible on a 2 rack cluster,
> the queued replication work never makes any progress, as in
> blockManager.validateReconstructionWork(), it checks to see if the new
> replica increases the number of racks, and if it does not, it skips it and
> tries again later.
> {code:java}
> DatanodeStorageInfo[] targets = rw.getTargets();
> if ((numReplicas.liveReplicas() >= requiredRedundancy) &&
> (!isPlacementPolicySatisfied(block)) ) {
> if (!isInNewRack(rw.getSrcNodes(), targets[0].getDatanodeDescriptor())) {
> // No use continuing, unless a new rack in this case
> return false;
> }
> // mark that the reconstruction work is to replicate internal block to a
> // new rack.
> rw.setNotEnoughRack();
> }
> {code}
> Additionally, in blockManager.scheduleReconstruction() is there some logic
> that sets the number of new replicas required to one, if the live replicas >=
> requiredReduncancy:
> {code:java}
> int additionalReplRequired;
> if (numReplicas.liveReplicas() < requiredRedundancy) {
> additionalReplRequired = requiredRedundancy - numReplicas.liveReplicas()
> - pendingNum;
> } else {
> additionalReplRequired = 1; // Needed on a new rack
> }{code}
> With UD, it is possible for 2 new replicas to be needed to meet the block
> placement policy, if all existing replicas are on nodes with the same domain.
> For traditional '2 rack redundancy', only 1 new replica would ever have been
> needed in this scenario.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
