[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16897696#comment-16897696
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-13541:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
19s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 6 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  5m 
51s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 24m 
57s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 16m 
40s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  2m 
49s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  3m 
32s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
19m 16s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  5m 
28s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
27s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
17s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  2m 
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 13m 
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 13m 
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 13m 
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
3m  8s{color} | {color:orange} root: The patch generated 7 new + 1566 unchanged 
- 4 fixed = 1573 total (was 1570) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  3m  
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch has 1 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git 
apply --whitespace=fix <<patch_file>>. Refer https://git-scm.com/docs/git-apply 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
11m 43s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  6m  
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  8m 
33s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m 
49s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 90m 36s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
43s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}222m 26s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailureWithRandomECPolicy |
|   | 
hadoop.hdfs.tools.offlineImageViewer.TestOfflineImageViewerWithStripedBlocks |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.tools.TestDFSAdmin |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDirectoryScanner |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.tools.offlineEditsViewer.TestOfflineEditsViewer |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.diskbalancer.TestDiskBalancer |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:63396beab41 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-13541 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12976371/HDFS-13541-branch-3.2.001.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  cc  xml  |
| uname | Linux 4812139ffee2 4.15.0-54-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 24 
10:55:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | branch-3.2 / d4492bd |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_212 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27363/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-root.txt
 |
| whitespace | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27363/artifact/out/whitespace-eol.txt
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27363/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27363/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 3622 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: . |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27363/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> NameNode Port based selective encryption
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-13541
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13541
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode, namenode, security
>            Reporter: Chen Liang
>            Assignee: Chen Liang
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-13541-branch-3.2.001.patch, NameNode Port based 
> selective encryption-v1.pdf
>
>
> Here at LinkedIn, one issue we face is that we need to enforce different 
> security requirement based on the location of client and the cluster. 
> Specifically, for clients from outside of the data center, it is required by 
> regulation that all traffic must be encrypted. But for clients within the 
> same data center, unencrypted connections are more desired to avoid the high 
> encryption overhead. 
> HADOOP-10221 introduced pluggable SASL resolver, based on which HADOOP-10335 
> introduced WhitelistBasedResolver which solves the same problem. However we 
> found it difficult to fit into our environment for several reasons. In this 
> JIRA, on top of pluggable SASL resolver, *we propose a different approach of 
> running RPC two ports on NameNode, and the two ports will be enforcing 
> encrypted and unencrypted connections respectively, and the following 
> DataNode access will simply follow the same behaviour of 
> encryption/unencryption*. Then by blocking unencrypted port on datacenter 
> firewall, we can completely block unencrypted external access.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to