[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16915592#comment-16915592
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14568:
----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
48s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 20m
7s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
1s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
9s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 34s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
22s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 27s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
17s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}107m 12s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}168m 44s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.tools.TestDFSZKFailoverController |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancer |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestDecommission |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancerWithMultipleNameNodes |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestNameNodeMXBean |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e53b4 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14568 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12978546/HDFS-14568.004.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux ce7de88694fa 4.15.0-54-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 24
10:55:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / d2225c8 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_222 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27673/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27673/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 3072 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27673/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> setStoragePolicy should check quota and update consume on storage type quota.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-14568
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14568
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0
> Reporter: Jinglun
> Assignee: Jinglun
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14568-001.patch, HDFS-14568-unit-test.patch,
> HDFS-14568.002.patch, HDFS-14568.003.patch, HDFS-14568.004.patch
>
>
> The quota and consume of the file's ancestors are not handled when the
> storage policy of the file is changed. For example:
> 1. Set quota StorageType.SSD fileSpace-1 to the parent dir;
> 2. Create a file size of fileSpace with storage policy \{DISK,DISK,DISK}
> under it;
> 3. Change the storage policy of the file to ALLSSD_STORAGE_POLICY_NAME and
> expect a QuotaByStorageTypeExceededException.
> Because the quota and consume is not handled, the expected exception is not
> threw out.
>
> There are 3 reasons why we should handle the consume and the quota.
> 1. Replication uses the new storage policy. Considering a file with BlockType
> CONTIGUOUS. It's replication factor is 3 and it's storage policy is "HOT".
> Now we change the policy to "ONE_SSD". If a DN goes down and the file needs
> replication, the NN will choose storages in policy "ONE_SSD" and replicate
> the block to a SSD storage.
> 2. We acturally have a cluster storaging both HOT and COLD data. We have a
> backgroud process searching all the files to find those that are not accessed
> for a period of time. Then we set them to COLD and start a mover to move the
> replicas. After moving, all the replicas are consistent with the storage
> policy.
> 3. The NameNode manages the global state of the cluster. If there is any
> inconsistent situation, such as the replicas doesn't match the storage policy
> of the file, we should take the NameNode as the standard and make the cluster
> to match the NameNode. The block replication is a good example of the rule.
> When we count the consume of a file(CONTIGUOUS), we multiply the replication
> factor with the file's length, no matter the file is under replicated or
> excessed. So does the storage type quota and consume.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
