[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16937730#comment-16937730
 ] 

Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-14873:
-------------------------------------

It would be like :

{code:java}
| `-triggerBlockReport` `[-incremental]` \<datanode\_host:ipc\_port\> 
`[-namenode <namenode_host:ipc_port>]` | Trigger a block report for the given 
datanode. If 'incremental' is specified, it will be otherwise, it will be a 
full block report. If '-namenode \<host\>:\<port\>' is given, it only sends 
block report to a specified namenode. |
{code}


> Fix dfsadmin doc for triggerBlockReport
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14873
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14873
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Fei Hui
>            Assignee: Fei Hui
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-14873.001.patch
>
>
> Doc for dfsadmin triggerBlockReport has a small issue in HDFSCommands.md
> {quote}
> hdfs dfsadmin [-triggerBlockReport [-incremental] <datanode_host:ipc_port> 
> [-namenode] <namenode_host:ipc_port>]
> {quote}
> *-namenode <namenode_host:ipc_port>* is optional. It should be *[-namenode 
> <namenode_host:ipc_port>]*, not *[-namenode] <namenode_host:ipc_port>*



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to