[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16937730#comment-16937730 ]
Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-14873: ------------------------------------- It would be like : {code:java} | `-triggerBlockReport` `[-incremental]` \<datanode\_host:ipc\_port\> `[-namenode <namenode_host:ipc_port>]` | Trigger a block report for the given datanode. If 'incremental' is specified, it will be otherwise, it will be a full block report. If '-namenode \<host\>:\<port\>' is given, it only sends block report to a specified namenode. | {code} > Fix dfsadmin doc for triggerBlockReport > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-14873 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14873 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 3.3.0 > Reporter: Fei Hui > Assignee: Fei Hui > Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14873.001.patch > > > Doc for dfsadmin triggerBlockReport has a small issue in HDFSCommands.md > {quote} > hdfs dfsadmin [-triggerBlockReport [-incremental] <datanode_host:ipc_port> > [-namenode] <namenode_host:ipc_port>] > {quote} > *-namenode <namenode_host:ipc_port>* is optional. It should be *[-namenode > <namenode_host:ipc_port>]*, not *[-namenode] <namenode_host:ipc_port>* -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org