[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16944026#comment-16944026
 ] 

Aravindan Vijayan edited comment on HDDS-2241 at 10/3/19 9:06 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

cc [~msingh] / [~aengineer] / [~bharat] / [~nanda]


was (Author: avijayan):
cc [~msingh] / [~aengineer] / [~bharat] / [~nanda619]

> Optimize the refresh pipeline logic used by KeyManagerImpl to obtain the 
> pipeline for a key
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-2241
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-2241
>             Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Ozone Manager
>            Reporter: Aravindan Vijayan
>            Assignee: Aravindan Vijayan
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, while looking up a key, the Ozone Manager gets the pipeline 
> location information from SCM through an RPC for every block in the key. For 
> large files > 1GB, we may end up making ~4 RPC calls for this. This can be 
> optimized in a couple of ways
> * We can implement a batch getContainerWithPipeline API in SCM using which we 
> can get the pipeline info locations for all the blocks for a file. To keep 
> the number of containers passed in to SCM in a single call, we can have a 
> fixed container batch size on the OM side. _Here, Number of calls = 1 (or k 
> depending on batch size)_
> * Instead, we can have a simple map (method local) for ContainerID -> 
> Pipeline that we get from SCM so that we don't need to make repeated calls to 
> SCM for the same containerID for a key. _Here, Number of calls = Number of 
> unique containerIDs_



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to