[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16952040#comment-16952040
 ] 

David Mollitor commented on HDFS-14854:
---------------------------------------

{code:java}
    if (blockManager.blocksMap.getStoredBlock(block) == null) {
      LOG.trace("Removing unknown block {}", block);
      return true;
    }

    long bcId = block.getBlockCollectionId();
    if (bcId == INodeId.INVALID_INODE_ID) {
      // Orphan block, will be invalidated eventually. Skip.
      return false;
    }
{code}

I think it should return 'true' if the block is orphaned, no?  It should skip 
them in the same way that an 'unknown' block is.

> Create improved decommission monitor implementation
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14854
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14854
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Stephen O'Donnell
>            Assignee: Stephen O'Donnell
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: Decommission_Monitor_V2_001.pdf, HDFS-14854.001.patch, 
> HDFS-14854.002.patch, HDFS-14854.003.patch, HDFS-14854.004.patch, 
> HDFS-14854.005.patch, HDFS-14854.006.patch, HDFS-14854.007.patch, 
> HDFS-14854.008.patch
>
>
> In HDFS-13157, we discovered a series of problems with the current 
> decommission monitor implementation, such as:
>  * Blocks are replicated sequentially disk by disk and node by node, and 
> hence the load is not spread well across the cluster
>  * Adding a node for decommission can cause the namenode write lock to be 
> held for a long time.
>  * Decommissioning nodes floods the replication queue and under replicated 
> blocks from a future node or disk failure may way for a long time before they 
> are replicated.
>  * Blocks pending replication are checked many times under a write lock 
> before they are sufficiently replicate, wasting resources
> In this Jira I propose to create a new implementation of the decommission 
> monitor that resolves these issues. As it will be difficult to prove one 
> implementation is better than another, the new implementation can be enabled 
> or disabled giving the option of the existing implementation or the new one.
> I will attach a pdf with some more details on the design and then a version 1 
> patch shortly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to