[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16968908#comment-16968908
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14815:
----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
57s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 20m
48s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
22s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 9s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
9s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 23s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 21m 15s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 83m 1s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterQuota |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterRpc |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterFaultTolerant |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterAllResolver |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterClientRejectOverload |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.metrics.TestMetricsBase |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterRpcMultiDestination |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.4 Server=19.03.4 Image:yetus/hadoop:104ccca9169 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14815 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12985138/HDFS-14815.005.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 59d6baa733c6 4.15.0-66-generic #75-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 1
05:24:09 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / dd90025 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_222 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/28265/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/28265/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 2434 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf U:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/28265/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> RBF: Update the quota in MountTable when calling setQuota on a MountTable src.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-14815
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14815
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jinglun
> Assignee: Jinglun
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14815.001.patch, HDFS-14815.002.patch,
> HDFS-14815.003.patch, HDFS-14815.004.patch, HDFS-14815.005.patch
>
>
> The method setQuota() can make the remote quota(the quota on real clusters)
> inconsistent with the MountTable. I think we have 3 ways to fix it:
> # Reject all the setQuota() rpcs if it trys to change the quota of a mount
> table.
> # Let setQuota() to change the mount table quota. Update the quota on zk
> first and then update remote quotas.
> # Do nothing. The RouterQuotaUpdateService will finally make all the remote
> quota right. We can tolerate short-term inconsistencies.
> I'd like option 1 because I want the RouterAdmin to be the only entrance to
> update the MountTable.
> Option 3 we don't need change anything, but the quota will be inconsistent
> for a short-term. The remote quota will be effective immediately and
> auto-changed back after a while. User might be confused about the behavior.
> Â
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
