[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17140300#comment-17140300
 ] 

bhji123 commented on HDFS-15419:
--------------------------------

Yes, router is just a proxy, and it's also a server.

Clients can decide whether wait/retry or not. But not all clients are so 
clever, especially when there is a variety of different clients.

For those not that smart clients, this pr is very useful. For those very smart 
clients who don't want router to retry, it's ok too because now router retry is 
configurable.

> RBF: Router should retry communicate with NN when cluster is unavailable 
> using configurable time interval
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-15419
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15419
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: configuration, hdfs-client, rbf
>            Reporter: bhji123
>            Priority: Major
>
> When cluster is unavailable, router -> namenode communication will only retry 
> once without any time interval, that is not reasonable.
> For example, in my company, which has several hdfs clusters with more than 
> 1000 nodes, we have encountered this problem. In some cases, the cluster 
> becomes unavailable briefly for about 10 or 30 seconds, at the same time, 
> almost all rpc requests to router failed because router only retry once 
> without time interval.
> It's better for us to enhance the router retry strategy, to retry 
> **communicate with NN using configurable time interval and max retry times.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to