[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsz-wo Sze updated HDFS-15477:
------------------------------
Description:
Snapshot deletion has caused a few bugs earlier such as HDFS-13101 and
HDFS-15313. In this JIRA, we propose enforcing in-order snapshot deletion --
only the earliest snapshot is actually deleted from the file system. The other
snapshots are only marked as deleted. They will be actually deleted from the
file system until all the earlier snapshots are deleted.
The reason of enforcing in-order snapshot deletion is based on the observation
that the logic of deleting the earliest snapshot is much simpler since the
prior snapshot does not exist. All the previous bugs are caused by removing
inodes from the prior snapshots.
One drawback of in-order snapshot deletion is that the non-earliest snapshots
are only marked as deleted but not actually deleted. The resources are not yet
released.
was:
Snapshot deletion has caused a few bugs earlier such as HDFS-13101 and
HDFS-15313. In this JIRA, we propose enforcing in-order snapshot deletion --
only the earliest snapshot is actually deleted from the file system. The other
snapshots are only marked as deleted. They will be actually deleted from the
file system until all the earlier snapshots are deleted.
> Enforce in-order snapshot deletion
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-15477
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15477
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: snapshots
> Reporter: Tsz-wo Sze
> Assignee: Tsz-wo Sze
> Priority: Major
>
> Snapshot deletion has caused a few bugs earlier such as HDFS-13101 and
> HDFS-15313. In this JIRA, we propose enforcing in-order snapshot deletion --
> only the earliest snapshot is actually deleted from the file system. The
> other snapshots are only marked as deleted. They will be actually deleted
> from the file system until all the earlier snapshots are deleted.
> The reason of enforcing in-order snapshot deletion is based on the
> observation that the logic of deleting the earliest snapshot is much simpler
> since the prior snapshot does not exist. All the previous bugs are caused by
> removing inodes from the prior snapshots.
> One drawback of in-order snapshot deletion is that the non-earliest snapshots
> are only marked as deleted but not actually deleted. The resources are not
> yet released.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
