[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17168917#comment-17168917
 ] 

Stephen O'Donnell commented on HDFS-15493:
------------------------------------------

I tested with the 004 patch:

 * Parallel Load on + this feature on - 209 / 207 seconds
 * Parallel Load on + this feature off - 225 / 228 seconds
 * Parallel Load off + this feature off = 370 / 408 seconds
 * Parallel Load off + this feature on = 325 / 341 seconds

This new patch improves things significantly, so I think we should go forward 
with this technique.

I think we should create a new patch where the feature cannot be enabled / 
disabled - just have it always on, as I cannot think of a good reason someone 
should turn it off, and it will make the code simpler if we just remove the 
switch. What do you think?

> Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-15493
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: Chengwei Wang
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-15493.001.patch, HDFS-15493.002.patch, 
> HDFS-15493.003.patch, HDFS-15493.004.patch, fsimage-loading.log
>
>
> While loading INodeDirectorySection of fsimage, it will update name cache and 
> block map after added inode file to inode directory. It would reduce time 
> cost of fsimage loading to enable these steps run in parallel.
> In our test case, with patch HDFS-13694 and HDFS-14617, the time cost to load 
> fsimage (220M files & 240M blocks) is 470s, with this patch , the time cost 
> reduc to 410s.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to