[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17182337#comment-17182337
]
Xiaoqiao He commented on HDFS-14852:
------------------------------------
Thanks [~ferhui] for your works here. For v006, it seems not necessary to check
`QUEUE_WITH_CORRUPT_BLOCKS` first. Because `QUEUE_WITH_CORRUPT_BLOCKS` is also
less than `LowRedundancyBlocks.LEVEL`, it can be covered by original code
segment logic.
{code:java}
+ if (priorityQueues.get(QUEUE_WITH_CORRUPT_BLOCKS).remove(block)) {
+ decrementBlockStat(block, QUEUE_WITH_CORRUPT_BLOCKS,
+ oldExpectedReplicas);
+ }
{code}
I am interested how reproduce this case. After quick check method
LowRedundancyBlocks#add and LowRedundancyBlocks#update, it seems one block
reference will exist only one single Queue. Any corner case will break this
constraint?
> Remove of LowRedundancyBlocks do NOT remove the block from all queues
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-14852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14852
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0, 3.0.3, 3.1.2, 3.3.0
> Reporter: Fei Hui
> Assignee: Fei Hui
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: CorruptBlocksMismatch.png, HDFS-14852.001.patch,
> HDFS-14852.002.patch, HDFS-14852.003.patch, HDFS-14852.004.patch,
> HDFS-14852.005.patch, HDFS-14852.006.patch, screenshot-1.png
>
>
> LowRedundancyBlocks.java
> {code:java}
> // Some comments here
> if(priLevel >= 0 && priLevel < LEVEL
> && priorityQueues.get(priLevel).remove(block)) {
> NameNode.blockStateChangeLog.debug(
> "BLOCK* NameSystem.LowRedundancyBlock.remove: Removing block {}"
> + " from priority queue {}",
> block, priLevel);
> decrementBlockStat(block, priLevel, oldExpectedReplicas);
> return true;
> } else {
> // Try to remove the block from all queues if the block was
> // not found in the queue for the given priority level.
> for (int i = 0; i < LEVEL; i++) {
> if (i != priLevel && priorityQueues.get(i).remove(block)) {
> NameNode.blockStateChangeLog.debug(
> "BLOCK* NameSystem.LowRedundancyBlock.remove: Removing block" +
> " {} from priority queue {}", block, i);
> decrementBlockStat(block, i, oldExpectedReplicas);
> return true;
> }
> }
> }
> return false;
> }
> {code}
> Source code is above, the comments as follow
> {quote}
> // Try to remove the block from all queues if the block was
> // not found in the queue for the given priority level.
> {quote}
> The function "remove" does NOT remove the block from all queues.
> Function add from LowRedundancyBlocks.java is used on some places and maybe
> one block in two or more queues.
> We found that corrupt blocks mismatch corrupt files on NN web UI. Maybe it is
> related to this.
> Upload initial patch
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
