[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17221107#comment-17221107
 ] 

Xiaoqiao He commented on HDFS-15651:
------------------------------------

{quote}The blocktoken key will be updated for every keyUpdateInterval 
(dfs.block.access.key.update.interval). Once we recover the 
CommandProcessingThread, DN will get the new key from NN in the next 
keyUpdateInterval (by default is 10 hours).{quote}
Actually true, but for the worst case, if the issue (include lack of memory or 
some other error) does not recovery for more than 30 hour (3*10hour) by 
default, the above exception will also meet, so I think let DataNode process 
exit may be a safe way. Or we could given time threshold or counter to decide 
if DataNode should exit when meet error in CommandProcessingThread. Thanks.

> Client could not obtain block when DN CommandProcessingThread exit
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-15651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15651
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Yiqun Lin
>            Priority: Major
>
> In our cluster, we applied the HDFS-14997 improvement.
>  We find one case that CommandProcessingThread will exit due to OOM error. 
> OOM error was caused by our one abnormal application that running on this DN 
> node.
> {noformat}
> 2020-10-18 10:27:12,604 ERROR 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Command processor 
> encountered fatal exception and exit.
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
>         at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method)
>         at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:717)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.addWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:957)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.execute(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1367)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetAsyncDiskService.execute(FsDatasetAsyncDiskService.java:173)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetAsyncDiskService.deleteAsync(FsDatasetAsyncDiskService.java:222)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl.invalidate(FsDatasetImpl.java:2005)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BPOfferService.processCommandFromActive(BPOfferService.java:671)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BPOfferService.processCommandFromActor(BPOfferService.java:617)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BPServiceActor$CommandProcessingThread.processCommand(BPServiceActor.java:1247)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BPServiceActor$CommandProcessingThread.access$1000(BPServiceActor.java:1194)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BPServiceActor$CommandProcessingThread$3.run(BPServiceActor.java:1299)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BPServiceActor$CommandProcessingThread.processQueue(BPServiceActor.java:1221)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BPServiceActor$CommandProcessingThread.run(BPServiceActor.java:1208)
> {noformat}
> Here the main point is that CommandProcessingThread crashed will lead a very 
> bad impact. All the NN response commands will not be processed by DN side.
> We enabled the block token to access the data, but here the DN command 
> DNA_ACCESSKEYUPDATE is not processed on time by DN. And then we see lots of 
> Sasl error due to key expiration in DN log:
> {noformat}
> javax.security.sasl.SaslException: DIGEST-MD5: IO error acquiring password 
> [Caused by org.apache.hadoop.security.token.SecretManager$InvalidToken: Can't 
> re-compute password for block_token_identifier (expiryDate=xxx, keyId=xx, 
> userId=xxx, blockPoolId=xxxx, blockId=xxx, access modes=[READ]), since the 
> required block key (keyID=xxx) doesn't exist.]
> {noformat}
>  
> For the impact in client side, our users receive lots of 'could not obtain 
> block' error  with BlockMissingException.
> CommandProcessingThread is a critical thread, it should always be running.
> {code:java}
>   /**
>    * CommandProcessingThread that process commands asynchronously.
>    */
>   class CommandProcessingThread extends Thread {
>     private final BPServiceActor actor;
>     private final BlockingQueue<Runnable> queue;
>     ...
>     @Override
>     public void run() {
>       try {
>         processQueue();
>       } catch (Throwable t) {
>         LOG.error("{} encountered fatal exception and exit.", getName(), t);  
>  <=== should not exit this thread
>       }
>     }
> {code}
> Once a unexpected error happened, a better handing should be:
>  * catch the exception, appropriately deal with the error and let 
> processQueue continue to run
>  or
>  * exit the DN process to let admin user investigate this



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to