[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16270?focusedWorklogId=665490&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-665490
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HDFS-16270:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 14/Oct/21 02:17
Start Date: 14/Oct/21 02:17
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: jianghuazhu commented on pull request #3547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3547#issuecomment-942885036
In the results of jenkins, there are some exceptions, such as:
TestHDFSFileSystemContract
TestLeaseRecovery
TestFileTruncate
TestBlockTokenWithDFSStriped
TestViewDistributedFileSystemWithMountLinks
After analysis, it does not seem to have much connection with the code I
submitted.
@tomscut @prasad-acit , would you like to spend some time to help review
this pr.
Thank you very much.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 665490)
Time Spent: 50m (was: 40m)
> Improve NNThroughputBenchmark#printUsage() related to block size
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16270
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16270
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: benchmarks, namenode
> Reporter: JiangHua Zhu
> Assignee: JiangHua Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When using the NNThroughputBenchmark test, if the usage is not correct, we
> will get some prompt messages.
> E.g:
> '
> If connecting to a remote NameNode with -fs option,
> dfs.namenode.fs-limits.min-block-size should be set to 16.
> 21/10/13 11:55:32 INFO util.ExitUtil: Exiting with status -1: ExitException
> '
> Yes, this way is good.
> However, the setting of'dfs.blocksize' has been completed before execution,
> for example:
> conf.setInt(DFSConfigKeys.DFS_BLOCK_SIZE_KEY, 16);
> We will still get the above prompt, which is wrong.
> At the same time, it should also be explained. The hint here should not be
> for'dfs.namenode.fs-limits.min-block-size', but should be'dfs.blocksize'.
> Because in the NNThroughputBenchmark construction,
> the'dfs.namenode.fs-limits.min-block-size' has been set to 0 in advance.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]