[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13190360#comment-13190360
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-2691:
-----------------------------------

Hi Dhruba. In your implementation, does the client send a special kind of 
packet in the data transfer protocol which causes the DN to report the RBW 
replicas? Or does the client directly contact all of the DNs to call 
updatePipeline, causing the RBW replicas to be filled in?
                
> HA: Tests and fixes for pipeline targets and replica recovery
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-2691
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2691
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ha
>    Affects Versions: HA branch (HDFS-1623)
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Assignee: Todd Lipcon
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: hdfs-2691.txt, hdfs-2691.txt
>
>
> Currently there are some TODOs around pipeline/recovery code in the HA 
> branch. For example, commitBlockSynchronization only gets sent to the active 
> NN which may have failed over by that point. So, we need to write some tests 
> here and figure out what the correct behavior is.
> Another related area is the treatment of targets in the pipeline. When a 
> pipeline is created, the active NN adds the "expected locations" to the 
> BlockInfoUnderConstruction, but the DN identifiers aren't logged with the 
> OP_ADD. So after a failover, the BlockInfoUnderConstruction will have no 
> targets and I imagine replica recovery would probably trigger some issues.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to