[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16622?focusedWorklogId=778582&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-778582
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HDFS-16622:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 06/Jun/22 11:27
Start Date: 06/Jun/22 11:27
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: hadoop-yetus commented on PR #4407:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4407#issuecomment-1147344802
:broken_heart: **-1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Logfile | Comment |
|:----:|----------:|--------:|:--------:|:-------:|
| +0 :ok: | reexec | 1m 3s | | Docker mode activated. |
|||| _ Prechecks _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | dupname | 0m 0s | | No case conflicting files
found. |
| +0 :ok: | codespell | 0m 1s | | codespell was not available. |
| +0 :ok: | detsecrets | 0m 1s | | detect-secrets was not available.
|
| +1 :green_heart: | @author | 0m 0s | | The patch does not contain
any @author tags. |
| -1 :x: | test4tests | 0m 0s | | The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
|
|||| _ trunk Compile Tests _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvninstall | 40m 18s | | trunk passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 1m 44s | | trunk passed with JDK
Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 1m 32s | | trunk passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07 |
| +1 :green_heart: | checkstyle | 1m 21s | | trunk passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvnsite | 1m 41s | | trunk passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 1m 22s | | trunk passed with JDK
Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 1m 40s | | trunk passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07 |
| +1 :green_heart: | spotbugs | 3m 48s | | trunk passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | shadedclient | 26m 0s | | branch has no errors
when building and testing our client artifacts. |
|||| _ Patch Compile Tests _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvninstall | 1m 24s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 1m 32s | | the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 |
| +1 :green_heart: | javac | 1m 32s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | compile | 1m 21s | | the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07 |
| +1 :green_heart: | javac | 1m 21s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | blanks | 0m 1s | | The patch has no blanks
issues. |
| +1 :green_heart: | checkstyle | 1m 1s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | mvnsite | 1m 29s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 59s | | the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 |
| +1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 1m 31s | | the patch passed with JDK
Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07 |
| +1 :green_heart: | spotbugs | 3m 33s | | the patch passed |
| +1 :green_heart: | shadedclient | 25m 41s | | patch has no errors
when building and testing our client artifacts. |
|||| _ Other Tests _ |
| +1 :green_heart: | unit | 395m 0s | | hadoop-hdfs in the patch
passed. |
| +1 :green_heart: | asflicense | 1m 2s | | The patch does not
generate ASF License warnings. |
| | | 512m 44s | | |
| Subsystem | Report/Notes |
|----------:|:-------------|
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base:
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4407/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
|
| GITHUB PR | https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4407 |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets |
| uname | Linux e7745f582308 4.15.0-175-generic #184-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 24
17:48:36 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 91f7ff3a9989a9a18398cf8c82b1e30492a86bad |
| Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07 |
| Multi-JDK versions | /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Private
Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private
Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07 |
| Test Results |
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4407/1/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 2066 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output |
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4407/1/console |
| versions | git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 778582)
Time Spent: 20m (was: 10m)
> addRDBI in IncrementalBlockReportManager may remove the block with bigger GS.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16622
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16622
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: ZanderXu
> Assignee: ZanderXu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In our production environment, there is a strange missing block, according
> to the log, I suspect there is a bug in function
> addRDBI(ReceivedDeletedBlockInfo rdbi,DatanodeStorage storage)(line 250).
> Bug code in the for loop:
> {code:java}
> synchronized void addRDBI(ReceivedDeletedBlockInfo rdbi,
> DatanodeStorage storage) {
> // Make sure another entry for the same block is first removed.
> // There may only be one such entry.
> for (PerStorageIBR perStorage : pendingIBRs.values()) {
> if (perStorage.remove(rdbi.getBlock()) != null) {
> break;
> }
> }
> getPerStorageIBR(storage).put(rdbi);
> }
> {code}
> Removed the GS of the Block in ReceivedDeletedBlockInfo may be greater than
> the GS of the Block in rdbi. And NN will invalidate the Replicate will small
> GS when complete one block.
> So If there is only one replicate for one block, there is a possibility of
> missingblock because of this wrong logic.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
