[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17550779#comment-17550779
]
Hiroyuki Adachi commented on HDFS-16613:
----------------------------------------
Hi [~caozhiqiang] ,
Using dfs.namenode.replication.max-streams-hard-limit is simple, but in my
understanding, it makes the decommissioning node busy, and most of the EC
blocks will not be replicated but reconstructed (see HDFS-14768). Since
reconstruction is expensive, HDFS-8786 makes using replication for EC blocks on
decommissioning node. Some people may prefer this.
What do you think of this?
> EC: Improve performance of decommissioning dn with many ec blocks
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16613
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16613
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ec, erasure-coding, namenode
> Affects Versions: 3.4.0
> Reporter: caozhiqiang
> Assignee: caozhiqiang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In a hdfs cluster with a lot of EC blocks, decommission a dn is very slow.
> The reason is unlike replication blocks can be replicated from any dn which
> has the same block replication, the ec block have to be replicated from the
> decommissioning dn.
> The configurations dfs.namenode.replication.max-streams and
> dfs.namenode.replication.max-streams-hard-limit will limit the replication
> speed, but increase these configurations will create risk to the whole
> cluster's network. So it should add a new configuration to limit the
> decommissioning dn, distinguished from the cluster wide max-streams limit.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
