[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13522?focusedWorklogId=782009&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-782009
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HDFS-13522:
-----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 16/Jun/22 10:58
            Start Date: 16/Jun/22 10:58
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: ZanderXu commented on PR #4441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4441#issuecomment-1157525096

   Thanks @zhengchenyu and @simbadzina .
   
   > I think config in client side may be more flexible.
   
   This is a very meaningful topic. If only the client controls whether or not 
to enable ObserverRead will be more difficult for Admin to control, because it 
is very difficult to upgrade the HDFS client in full. In other words: If RBF 
controls whether the ObserverRead is enabled, the Admin will be very convenient 
to control the ObserverRead of the entire cluster, and even dynamically control 
whether the ObserverRead of a single NS or the entire cluster is enabled. 
   But there may be some special Client that do not want to enable 
ObserverRead, so RBF should identify those requests and proxy them to the 
Active Namenode. 
   
   @simbadzina This is why dynamic updates are required, so that when Admin 
finds that there are some abnormal Observer NameNodes, he/she can quickly 
disable the ObserverRead of one NS or even all NSs.
   
   > In our draft design, after apply 
[HDFS-13522](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13522).002.patch, I 
wanna proxy client's state id.
   
   Proxying client's state id to the NameNode by RBF will be very complicated. 
   - A DFSClient may read or write some paths of different NameServices, and 
the stateID of different NS may be different.
   - The client does not know the Nameservice to which the reading or writing 
path belong, so it cannot pass the state id to RBF.
   




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 782009)
    Time Spent: 13h 10m  (was: 13h)

> RBF: Support observer node from Router-Based Federation
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-13522
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13522
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: federation, namenode
>            Reporter: Erik Krogen
>            Assignee: Simbarashe Dzinamarira
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: HDFS-13522.001.patch, HDFS-13522.002.patch, 
> HDFS-13522_WIP.patch, RBF_ Observer support.pdf, Router+Observer RPC 
> clogging.png, ShortTerm-Routers+Observer.png
>
>          Time Spent: 13h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Changes will need to occur to the router to support the new observer node.
> One such change will be to make the router understand the observer state, 
> e.g. {{FederationNamenodeServiceState}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to