[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17610966#comment-17610966
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-16785:
---------------------------------------
ZanderXu commented on PR #4945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4945#issuecomment-1262143802
```
try (AutoCloseDataSetLock l = lockManager.readLock(LockLevel.VOLUME, bpid,
fsVolume.getStorageID())) {
fsVolume.addBlockPool(bpid, this.conf, this.timer);
fsVolume.getVolumeMap(bpid, tempVolumeMap, ramDiskReplicaTracker);
} catch (IOException e) {
LOG.warn("Caught exception when adding " + fsVolume +
". Will throw later.", e);
exceptions.add(e);
}
```
Changing the code as above? Emm.. Holding the BP read lock for a long time
will have a great impact on the operations that need to acquire the BP write
lock, such as: invalidate, recoverAppend, createTemporary.
The current logic uses IOException to avoid the conflict case, I think it's
ok. And there is no lock before HDFS-15382, means it's ok. If we can find one
conflict case, we can use IOException to fix it.
> DataNode hold BP write lock to scan disk
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16785
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16785
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: ZanderXu
> Assignee: ZanderXu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> When patching the fine-grained locking of datanode, I found that `addVolume`
> will hold the write block of the BP lock to scan the new volume to get the
> blocks. If we try to add one full volume that was fixed offline before, i
> will hold the write lock for a long time.
> The related code as bellows:
> {code:java}
> for (final NamespaceInfo nsInfo : nsInfos) {
> String bpid = nsInfo.getBlockPoolID();
> try (AutoCloseDataSetLock l = lockManager.writeLock(LockLevel.BLOCK_POOl,
> bpid)) {
> fsVolume.addBlockPool(bpid, this.conf, this.timer);
> fsVolume.getVolumeMap(bpid, tempVolumeMap, ramDiskReplicaTracker);
> } catch (IOException e) {
> LOG.warn("Caught exception when adding " + fsVolume +
> ". Will throw later.", e);
> exceptions.add(e);
> }
> } {code}
> And I noticed that this lock is added by HDFS-15382, means that this logic is
> not in lock before.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
