[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Haiyang Hu updated HDFS-16813:
------------------------------
    Description: 
In DatanodeAdminManager#activate

{code:java}
int blocksPerInterval = conf.getInt(
    DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY,
    DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_DEFAULT);

final String deprecatedKey =
    "dfs.namenode.decommission.nodes.per.interval";
final String strNodes = conf.get(deprecatedKey);
if (strNodes != null) {
  LOG.warn("Deprecated configuration key {} will be ignored.",
      deprecatedKey);
  LOG.warn("Please update your configuration to use {} instead.",
      DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY);
}

checkArgument(blocksPerInterval > 0,
    "Must set a positive value for "
    + DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY);

final int maxConcurrentTrackedNodes = conf.getInt(
    DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES,
    DFSConfigKeys
        .DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES_DEFAULT);
checkArgument(maxConcurrentTrackedNodes >= 0, "Cannot set a negative " +
    "value for "
    + DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES);
{code}

there is no need for parameters
dfs.namenode.decommission.blocks.per.interval and
dfs.namenode.decommission.max.concurrent.tracked.nodes to verify.
Because the parameters are processed in DatanodeAdminMonitorBase and 
DatanodeAdminDefaultMonitor.




  was:
In DatanodeAdminManager#activate

{code:java}
int blocksPerInterval = conf.getInt(
    DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY,
    DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_DEFAULT);

final String deprecatedKey =
    "dfs.namenode.decommission.nodes.per.interval";
final String strNodes = conf.get(deprecatedKey);
if (strNodes != null) {
  LOG.warn("Deprecated configuration key {} will be ignored.",
      deprecatedKey);
  LOG.warn("Please update your configuration to use {} instead.",
      DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY);
}

checkArgument(blocksPerInterval > 0,
    "Must set a positive value for "
    + DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY);

final int maxConcurrentTrackedNodes = conf.getInt(
    DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES,
    DFSConfigKeys
        .DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES_DEFAULT);
checkArgument(maxConcurrentTrackedNodes >= 0, "Cannot set a negative " +
    "value for "
    + DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES);
{code}

There is no need for parameters
dfs.namenode.decommission.blocks.per.interval and
dfs.namenode.decommission.max.concurrent.tracked.nodes to verify.
Because the parameters are processed in DatanodeAdminMonitorBase and 
DatanodeAdminDefaultMonitor.





> Remove parameter validation logic such as 
> dfs.namenode.decommission.blocks.per.interval in DatanodeAdminManager#activate
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-16813
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16813
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Haiyang Hu
>            Assignee: Haiyang Hu
>            Priority: Major
>
> In DatanodeAdminManager#activate
> {code:java}
> int blocksPerInterval = conf.getInt(
>     DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY,
>     DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_DEFAULT);
> final String deprecatedKey =
>     "dfs.namenode.decommission.nodes.per.interval";
> final String strNodes = conf.get(deprecatedKey);
> if (strNodes != null) {
>   LOG.warn("Deprecated configuration key {} will be ignored.",
>       deprecatedKey);
>   LOG.warn("Please update your configuration to use {} instead.",
>       DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY);
> }
> checkArgument(blocksPerInterval > 0,
>     "Must set a positive value for "
>     + DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY);
> final int maxConcurrentTrackedNodes = conf.getInt(
>     DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES,
>     DFSConfigKeys
>         .DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES_DEFAULT);
> checkArgument(maxConcurrentTrackedNodes >= 0, "Cannot set a negative " +
>     "value for "
>     + DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES);
> {code}
> there is no need for parameters
> dfs.namenode.decommission.blocks.per.interval and
> dfs.namenode.decommission.max.concurrent.tracked.nodes to verify.
> Because the parameters are processed in DatanodeAdminMonitorBase and 
> DatanodeAdminDefaultMonitor.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to