[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17678606#comment-17678606
 ] 

Takanobu Asanuma commented on HDFS-16889:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks for your comment, [~simbadzina].
 - I think it would be better to create a backport PR under each existing JIRA 
if there are not many conflicts.
 - HDFS-14090 is a relatively large change. I want to get a consensus on 
whether we can backport to branch-3.3 in the JIRA.
 - Yes, I will do that. I can also review them if you do it.

> Backport JIRAs related to RBF SBN to branch-3.3
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-16889
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16889
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Takanobu Asanuma
>            Assignee: Takanobu Asanuma
>            Priority: Major
>
> This is an umbrella JIRA to backport RBF SBN to branch-3.3. There are some 
> conflicts when trying to backport HDFS-13522 and HDFS-16767, the main 
> implementations of RBF SBN. Currently, to solve the conflicts, we need to 
> backport the following JIRAs sequentially. (Thanks [~simbadzina] for the 
> information.)
>  # HDFS-14090
>  # HDFS-15417
>  # HDFS-16296
>  # HDFS-16302
>  # HDFS-15757
>  # HDFS-13274
>  # Then HDFS-13522
>  # HDFS-16065
>  # HDFS-16313
>  # HDFS-16273
>  # Then HDFS-16767 + other bug fixes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to