[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17706537#comment-17706537
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-16949:
---------------------------------------
rdingankar commented on code in PR #5495:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5495#discussion_r1152326777
##########
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/lib/MutableQuantiles.java:
##########
@@ -162,7 +206,7 @@ public synchronized void setEstimator(QuantileEstimator
quantileEstimator) {
* Runnable used to periodically roll over the internal
* {@link SampleQuantiles} every interval.
*/
- private static class RolloverSample implements Runnable {
+ static class RolloverSample implements Runnable {
Review Comment:
The scope is widened for the class to be accessible from subclass
`InversePercentile` and not for Test purposes, so not adding the annotation.
> Update ReadTransferRate to ReadLatencyPerGB for effective percentile metrics
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16949
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16949
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: datanode
> Reporter: Ravindra Dingankar
> Assignee: Ravindra Dingankar
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.4.0
>
>
> HDFS-16917 added ReadTransferRate quantiles to calculate the rate which data
> is read per unit of time.
> With percentiles the values are sorted in ascending order and hence for the
> transfer rate p90 gives us the value where 90 percent rates are lower
> (worse), p99 gives us the value where 99 percent values are lower (worse).
> Note that value(p90) < p(99) thus p99 is a better transfer rate as compared
> to p90.
> However as the percentile increases the value should become worse in order to
> know how good our system is.
> Hence instead of calculating the data read transfer rate, we should calculate
> it's inverse. We will instead calculate the time taken for a GB of data to be
> read. ( seconds / GB )
> After this the p90 value will give us 90 percentage of total values where the
> time taken is less than value(p90), similarly for p99 and others.
> Also p(90) < p(99) and here p(99) will become a worse value (taking more time
> each byte) as compared to p(90)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
