[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17710130#comment-17710130
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-16974:
---------------------------------------
zhangshuyan0 commented on code in PR #5541:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5541#discussion_r1161694585
##########
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/TestReplicationPolicyRatioConsiderLoadWithStorage.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement;
+
+import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSTestUtil;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestBlockStoragePolicy;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.HdfsServerConstants;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.DatanodeStorage;
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.Set;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
+
+public class TestReplicationPolicyRatioConsiderLoadWithStorage
+ extends BaseReplicationPolicyTest {
+
+ public TestReplicationPolicyRatioConsiderLoadWithStorage() {
+ this.blockPlacementPolicy = BlockPlacementPolicyDefault.class.getName();
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ DatanodeDescriptor[] getDatanodeDescriptors(Configuration conf) {
+ conf.setBoolean(DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_REDUNDANCY_CONSIDERLOAD_KEY,
+ true);
+ conf.setDouble(DFSConfigKeys
+ .DFS_NAMENODE_REDUNDANCY_CONSIDERLOAD_FACTOR, 2);
+ conf.setBoolean(
+ DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_REDUNDANCY_CONSIDERLOADBYVOLUME_KEY, true);
+
+ final String[] racks = {
+ "/rack1",
+ "/rack2",
+ "/rack3",
+ "/rack4",
+ "/rack5"};
+ storages = DFSTestUtil.createDatanodeStorageInfos(racks);
+ DatanodeDescriptor[] descriptors =
+ DFSTestUtil.toDatanodeDescriptor(storages);
+ long storageCapacity =
+ 2 * HdfsServerConstants.MIN_BLOCKS_FOR_WRITE * BLOCK_SIZE;
+ // Each datanode has 6 storages, but the number of available storages
+ // varies.
+ for (int i = 0; i < descriptors.length; i++) {
+ for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
+ DatanodeStorage s =
+ new DatanodeStorage("s" + i + j);
Review Comment:
Yes it is, the main purpose is to ensure that the storageID in a datanode is
unique.
> Consider load of every volume when choosing target
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16974
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16974
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Shuyan Zhang
> Assignee: Shuyan Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> The current target choosing policy only considers the load of the entire
> datanode. If both DN1 and DN2 have an `xceiverCount` of 100, but DN1 has 10
> volumes to write to and DN2 only has 1, then the pressure on DN2 is actually
> much greater than that on DN1. This patch has added a configuration that
> allows us to avoid nodes with too much pressure on a single volume when
> choosing targets, so as to avoid overloading datanodes with few volumes or
> slowing down writes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
