[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
WangYuanben updated HDFS-17061:
-------------------------------
Description:
When choosing DN for placing data block or parity block, the existing number of
data block and parity block on datanode is not taken into consideration. This
may lead to *uneven traffic load*.
As shown in the figure 1, when reading block group A, B, C, D and E from five
different EC files without any missing block, datanodes like DN1 and DN2 will
have high traffic load. However, datanodes like DN3, DN4 and DN5 may have low
or even no traffic load.
!figure1, unbalanced traffic load on DNs.png|width=700,height=550!
If we can let data blocks and parity blocks on DNs more balanced, +the traffic
load in cluster will be more balanced and the peak traffic load on DN will be
reduced+. Here "balance" refers to the matching of the number of data blocks
and parity blocks on DN with its EC policy. In the ideal state, each DN has a
balanced traffic load just like what figure 2 shows.
!figure2, balanced traffic load on DNs.png|width=700,height=550!
Then how to reduce this imbalance? I think it's related to EC policy and the
ratio of data blocks to parity blocks on datanode. For RS-3-2-1024k, it's
appropriate to let the ratio close to 3:2.
There are two solutions:
1.Improve the block placement policy.
2.Improve the Balancer.
was:
When choosing DN for placing data block or parity block, the existing number of
data block and parity block on datanode is not taken into consideration. This
may lead to *uneven traffic load*.
As shown in the figure 1, when reading block group A, B, C, D and E from five
different EC files without any missing block, datanodes like DN1 and DN2 will
have high traffic load. However, datanodes like DN3, DN4 and DN5 may have low
or even no traffic load.
!figure1, unbalanced traffic load on DNs.png|width=850,height=550!
If we can let data blocks and parity blocks on DNs more balanced, +the traffic
load in cluster will be more balanced and the peak traffic load on DN will be
reduced+. Here "balance" refers to the matching of the number of data blocks
and parity blocks on DN with its EC policy. In the ideal state, each DN has a
balanced traffic load just like what figure 2 shows.
!figure2, balanced traffic load on DNs.png|width=850,height=550!
Then how to reduce this imbalance? I think it's related to EC policy and the
ratio of data blocks to parity blocks on datanode. For RS-3-2-1024k, it's
appropriate to let the ratio close to 3:2.
There are two solutions:
1.Improve the block placement policy.
2.Improve the Balancer.
> EC: Let data blocks and parity blocks on DNs more balanced
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-17061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17061
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: balamcer, erasure-coding
> Reporter: WangYuanben
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: figure1, unbalanced traffic load on DNs.png, figure2,
> balanced traffic load on DNs.png
>
>
> When choosing DN for placing data block or parity block, the existing number
> of data block and parity block on datanode is not taken into consideration.
> This may lead to *uneven traffic load*.
> As shown in the figure 1, when reading block group A, B, C, D and E from five
> different EC files without any missing block, datanodes like DN1 and DN2 will
> have high traffic load. However, datanodes like DN3, DN4 and DN5 may have low
> or even no traffic load.
> !figure1, unbalanced traffic load on DNs.png|width=700,height=550!
> If we can let data blocks and parity blocks on DNs more balanced, +the
> traffic load in cluster will be more balanced and the peak traffic load on DN
> will be reduced+. Here "balance" refers to the matching of the number of data
> blocks and parity blocks on DN with its EC policy. In the ideal state, each
> DN has a balanced traffic load just like what figure 2 shows.
> !figure2, balanced traffic load on DNs.png|width=700,height=550!
> Then how to reduce this imbalance? I think it's related to EC policy and the
> ratio of data blocks to parity blocks on datanode. For RS-3-2-1024k, it's
> appropriate to let the ratio close to 3:2.
> There are two solutions:
> 1.Improve the block placement policy.
> 2.Improve the Balancer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
