[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17747202#comment-17747202
]
Simbarashe Dzinamarira edited comment on HDFS-17124 at 8/1/23 5:46 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"dfs.client.rbf.observer.enable" was not an elegant way to support observer
reads with the IPFailoverProxyProvider. I think we should not spread this
config to RouterObserverReadProxy provide, but instead deprecate it.
was (Author: simbadzina):
"dfs.client.rbf.observer.enable" was a hack-ish way to support observer reads
with the IPFailoverProxyProvider. I think we should not spread with config to
RouterObserverReadProxy provide, but instead deprecate it.
> RBF: RouterObserverReadProxyProvider should respect observer read opt-out via
> dfs.client.rbf.observer.enable flag.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-17124
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17124
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Simbarashe Dzinamarira
> Assignee: Simbarashe Dzinamarira
> Priority: Minor
>
> The "dfs.client.rbf.observer.enable" flag was add to allow a client using
> IPFailoverProxyProvider to use observer reads with routers.
> Now we have implemented the RouterObserverReadProxyProvider which better
> supported observer reads, i.e performing msync automatically.
> In our environment, we still have clients that opted out of observer reads by
> setting "dfs.client.rbf.observer.enable
> =false". The RouterObserverReadProxyProvider should respect the opt-out
> decision of these clients.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
