[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17803891#comment-17803891
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17327:
---------------------------------------

huangzhaobo99 commented on PR #6421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6421#issuecomment-1879915837

   Hi @ayushtkn If you have time, review the code logic. 
   Due to product design issues, a large number of UT do not match the actual 
situation. 
   If this logic is correct, I will fix the remaining UT according to the 
modified code logic.




> Fix the judgment logic of the ReconfigurableBase class method 
> reconfigureProperty.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-17327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17327
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: huangzhaobo
>            Assignee: huangzhaobo
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> 1. If it is a null value, after reconfig, the current system value will take 
> effect and not necessarily the default value.
> 2. {{ReconfigurableBase#reconfigureProperty}} judges the condition 
> incorrectly, When the effectValue is not null, the system value needs to be 
> changed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to