[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17844587#comment-17844587
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17514:
---------------------------------------

simbadzina opened a new pull request, #6804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6804

   <!--
     Thanks for sending a pull request!
       1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute
       2. Make sure your PR title starts with JIRA issue id, e.g., 
'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...'.
   -->
   
   ### Description of PR
   When a namenode that had "dfs.namenode.state.context.enabled" set to true is 
restarted with the configuration set to false, routers will keep using a 
previously cached state ID.
   
   Without RBF
   
   - clients that fetched the old stateID could have stale reads even after 
msyncing
   - new clients will go to the active.
   
   With RBF
   
   - client that fetched the old stateID could have stale reads like above.
   - New clients will also fetch the stale stateID and potentially have stale 
reads
   
   New clients that are created after the restart should not fetch the stale 
state ID.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   New unit test
   Unit test fails with the patch is PoolAlignmentContext in the second commit.
   Unit test pass with the patch.
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   




> RBF: Routers keep using cached stateID even when active NN returns unset 
> header
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-17514
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17514
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: rbf
>            Reporter: Simbarashe Dzinamarira
>            Assignee: Simbarashe Dzinamarira
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When a namenode that had "dfs.namenode.state.context.enabled" set to true is 
> restarted with the configuration set to false, routers will keep using a 
> previously cached state ID.
> Without RBF
> * clients that fetched the old stateID could have stale reads even after 
> msyncing
> * new clients will go to the active.
> With RBF
> * client that fetched the old stateID could have stale reads like above.
> * New clients will also fetch the stale stateID and potentially have stale 
> reads
> New clients that are created after the restart should not fetch the stale 
> state ID.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to