[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17848881#comment-17848881
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17529:
---------------------------------------
ZanderXu commented on code in PR #6833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6833#discussion_r1611258872
##########
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/federation/store/CachedRecordStore.java:
##########
@@ -198,8 +195,15 @@ public void overrideExpiredRecords(QueryResult<R> query)
throws IOException {
if (commitRecords.size() > 0) {
getDriver().putAll(commitRecords, true, false);
}
- if (deleteRecords.size() > 0) {
- newRecords.removeAll(deleteRecords);
+ if (!toDeleteRecords.isEmpty()) {
+ for (Map.Entry<R, Boolean> entry :
getDriver().removeMultiple(toDeleteRecords).entrySet()) {
+ if (entry.getValue()) {
+ deletedRecords.add(entry.getKey());
Review Comment:
Here changing to `newRecords.remove(entry.getKey())`, we can remove
`deletedRecords`.
> RBF: Improve router state store cache entry deletion
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-17529
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17529
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hdfs, rbf
> Reporter: Felix N
> Assignee: Felix N
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Current implementation for router state store update is quite inefficient, so
> much that when routers are removed and a lot of NameNodeMembership records
> are deleted in a short burst, the deletions triggered a router safemode in
> our cluster and caused a lot of troubles.
> This ticket aims to improve the deletion process for ZK state store
> implementation.
> See HDFS-17532 for the other half of this improvement
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]