[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17896440#comment-17896440
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17641:
---------------------------------------
PrateekSane commented on code in PR #7123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7123#discussion_r1833165506
##########
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/metrics/ECBlockGroupsMBean.java:
##########
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ public interface ECBlockGroupsMBean {
long getPendingDeletionECBlocks();
/**
- * Return total number of erasure coded block groups.
+ * @return total number of erasure coded block groups.
Review Comment:
If I don't include this javadoc fails. However even when I do include this a
different javadoc fails for essentially same issue. Should I chase down all the
issues or leave it be?
> Add badly distributed blocks metric for low redundancy blocks
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-17641
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17641
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
> Reporter: Prateek Sane
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Low Redundancy blocks have different priority levels including highest
> priority, very low redundancy, low redundancy, badly distributed, and corrupt.
> Having a metric for the number of badly distributed blocks would be helpful.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
