[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18032975#comment-18032975
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-16899:
---------------------------------------

github-actions[bot] commented on PR #5414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5414#issuecomment-3447890984

   We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no 
activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a 
way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
   If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working 
on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the 
stale tag and review again.
   Thanks all for your contribution.




> Fix 
> TestAddOverReplicatedStripedBlocks#testProcessOverReplicatedAndCorruptStripedBlock
>  failed
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-16899
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16899
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Haiyang Hu
>            Assignee: Haiyang Hu
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> TestAddOverReplicatedStripedBlocks#testProcessOverReplicatedAndCorruptStripedBlock
>  occasionally appear failed.
> Failed code Line is 
> {code:java}
> // verify that all internal blocks exists except b0
> // the redundant internal blocks will not be deleted before the corrupted
> // block gets reconstructed. but since we set
> // DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_MAX_STREAMS_KEY to 0, the reconstruction will
> // not happen
> lbs = cluster.getNameNodeRpc().getBlockLocations(filePath.toString(), 0,
>  fileLen);
> bg = (LocatedStripedBlock) (lbs.get(0)); 
> assertEquals(groupSize + 1, bg.getBlockIndices().length); //here not equals. 
> {code}
> From the perspective of normal logic, the internal blocks that need to be 
> obtained are 10, 8 live and 2 redundant internal blocks, 
> but due to the processing logic that occasionally triggers invalidate to 
> remove redundant internal block, 
> the final obtained internal blocks value does not meet expectations.
> So need avoid the redundant internal blocks will be deleted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to