[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18035179#comment-18035179
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-16754:
---------------------------------------
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #4840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4840#issuecomment-3483176812
We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no
activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a
way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working
on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the
stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.
> UnderConstruct file with missingBlock should be able to recover lease
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16754
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16754
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: ZanderXu
> Assignee: ZanderXu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> During looking into the logic of RecoverLease, I guess there is a bug:
> {code:java}
> int nrCompleteBlocks;
> BlockInfo curBlock = null;
> for(nrCompleteBlocks = 0; nrCompleteBlocks < nrBlocks; nrCompleteBlocks++) {
> curBlock = blocks[nrCompleteBlocks];
> if(!curBlock.isComplete())
> break;
> // Why?
> assert blockManager.hasMinStorage(curBlock) :
> "A COMPLETE block is not minimally replicated in " + src;
> } {code}
> RecoverLease just try to align all replicas of the last block of one
> UnderConstruct file.
> So if the UC file with some completed blocks, which may missed all replicas,
> should be able to recoverLease.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
