[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18040935#comment-18040935
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-15160:
---------------------------------------

github-actions[bot] commented on PR #3196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3196#issuecomment-3583629250

   We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no 
activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a 
way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
   If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working 
on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the 
stale tag and review again.
   Thanks all for your contribution.




> ReplicaMap, Disk Balancer, Directory Scanner and various FsDatasetImpl 
> methods should use datanode readlock
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-15160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15160
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Stephen O'Donnell
>            Assignee: Stephen O'Donnell
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.2.3
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-15160-branch-3.3-001.patch, HDFS-15160.001.patch, 
> HDFS-15160.002.patch, HDFS-15160.003.patch, HDFS-15160.004.patch, 
> HDFS-15160.005.patch, HDFS-15160.006.patch, HDFS-15160.007.patch, 
> HDFS-15160.008.patch, HDFS-15160.branch-3-3.001.patch, 
> image-2020-04-10-17-18-08-128.png, image-2020-04-10-17-18-55-938.png
>
>          Time Spent: 7h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Now we have HDFS-15150, we can start to move some DN operations to use the 
> read lock rather than the write lock to improve concurrence. The first step 
> is to make the changes to ReplicaMap, as many other methods make calls to it.
> This Jira switches read operations against the volume map to use the readLock 
> rather than the write lock.
> Additionally, some methods make a call to replicaMap.replicas() (eg 
> getBlockReports, getFinalizedBlocks, deepCopyReplica) and only use the result 
> in a read only fashion, so they can also be switched to using a readLock.
> Next is the directory scanner and disk balancer, which only require a read 
> lock.
> Finally (for this Jira) are various "low hanging fruit" items in BlockSender 
> and fsdatasetImpl where is it fairly obvious they only need a read lock.
> For now, I have avoided changing anything which looks too risky, as I think 
> its better to do any larger refactoring or risky changes each in their own 
> Jira.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to