[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18041705#comment-18041705
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-16000:
---------------------------------------
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #2964:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2964#issuecomment-3594031166
We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no
activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a
way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working
on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the
stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.
> HDFS : Rename performance optimization
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16000
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16000
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hdfs, namenode
> Affects Versions: 3.1.4, 3.3.1
> Reporter: Xiangyi Zhu
> Assignee: Xiangyi Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: 20210428-143238.svg, 20210428-171635-lambda.svg,
> HDFS-16000.patch
>
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> It takes a long time to move a large directory with rename. For example, it
> takes about 40 seconds to move a 1000W directory. When a large amount of data
> is deleted to the trash, the move large directory will occur when the recycle
> bin makes checkpoint. In addition, the user may also actively trigger the
> move large directory operation, which will cause the NameNode to lock too
> long and be killed by Zkfc. Through the flame graph, it is found that the
> main time consuming is to create the EnumCounters object.
>
> h3. Rename logic optimization:
> * Regardless of whether the rename operation is the source directory and the
> target directory, the quota count must be calculated three times. The first
> time, check whether the moved directory exceeds the target directory quota,
> the second time, calculate the mobile directory quota to update the source
> directory quota, and the third time, calculate the mobile directory
> configuration update to the target directory.
> * I think some of the above three quota quota calculations are unnecessary.
> For example, if all parent directories of the source directory and target
> directory are not configured with quota, there is no need to calculate
> quotaCount. Even if both the source directory and the target directory use
> quota, there is no need to calculate the quota three times. The calculation
> logic for the first and third times is the same, and it only needs to be
> calculated once.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
