[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13271131#comment-13271131
]
Eli Collins commented on HDFS-2885:
-----------------------------------
Sanjay,
The only difference is that "dfs.federation.nameservices" would become
"dfs.nameservices" and "dfs.federation.nameservice.id" (which is typically not
set) would become "dfs.nameservice.id". Same before/after for both HA and
federation configs except the word "federation" is not used.
Reasonable?
> Remove "federation" from the nameservice config options
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-2885
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2885
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.23.1
> Reporter: Eli Collins
>
> HDFS-1623, and potentially other HDFS features will use the nameservice
> abstraction, even if federation is not enabled (eg you need to configure
> {{dfs.federation.nameservices}} in HA even if you're not using federation
> just to declare your nameservice). This is confusing to users. We should
> consider deprecating and removing "federation" from the
> {{dfs.federation.nameservices}} and {{dfs.federation.nameservice.id}} config
> options, as {{dfs.nameservices}} and {{dfs.nameservice.id}} are more
> intuitive.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
