[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13273638#comment-13273638
 ] 

Aaron T. Myers commented on HDFS-3409:
--------------------------------------

Hi Hitesh,

bq. I would defer to anyone who is more well versed with HDFS to make a call on 
where it makes sense to expose this information for 1.x ( whether it is in the 
namenode if it tracks the last checkpoint time or do it separately in each SNN 
given that multiple SNNs are supported

What gives you the impression that running multiple Secondary NameNodes is 
supported? I don't know of any deployments that consciously choose to run 
multiple 2NNs, and it's not a configuration that HDFS is designed to support, 
in my experience.

Given that, putting this info on the NN makes more sense to me.
                
> Secondary namenode should expose checkpoint info via JMX
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3409
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3409
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.2
>            Reporter: Hitesh Shah
>
> Information such as when the last checkpoint was done should be exposed via 
> JMX so that it can be easily queried via scripts. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to