[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281167#comment-13281167
 ] 

Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-3453:
----------------------------------

Manually ran test-patch
{noformat}
     [exec] -1 overall.  
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     -1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new 
or modified tests.
     [exec]                         Please justify why no tests are needed for 
this patch.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning 
messages.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number 
of javac compiler warnings.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     -1 findbugs.  The patch appears to introduce 8 new Findbugs 
(version 1.3.9) warnings.
{noformat}

* test : No test was added since there is no functional change within the 
build/release.
* findbugs : Contrary to the report, this change does not introduce any 
additional findbug warnings.
                
> HDFS does not use ClientProtocol in a backward-compatible way
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3453
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3453
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: hdfs client
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: hdfs-3453-branch-1.patch
>
>
> HDFS-617 was brought into branch-0.20-security/branch-1 to support 
> non-recursive create, along with HADOOP-6840 and HADOOP-6886. However, the 
> changes in HDFS was done in an incompatible way, making the client unusable 
> against older clusters, even when plain old create() is called. This is 
> because DFS now internally calls create() through the newly introduced 
> method. By simply changing how the methods are wired internally, we can 
> remove this limitation. We may eventually switch back to the approach in 
> HDFS-617 when the majority of users adopt branch-1 based releases.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to