[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13293568#comment-13293568
]
Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-3389:
-------------------------------------------
Thanks a lot Surendra for your verification.
Yes, dfs.ha.namenode.id should be covered in previous sections. Lets file
separte JIRA for that as that will not be under this JIRA scope. This JIRA aims
to cover the BK integration related properties and usage.
Attached the patch by addressing my above comment.
> Document the BKJM usage in Namenode HA.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-3389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: name-node
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha, 3.0.0
> Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Attachments: HDFS-3389-1.patch, HDFS-3389.diff, HDFS-3389.patch,
> HDFSHighAvailability.html
>
>
> As per the discussion in HDFS-234, We need clear documentation for BKJM usage
> in Namenode HA.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
